Ryzen 9 7840HX vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 7840HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 790 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
| Power efficiency | 60.30 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 7 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 17 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 7840HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 17 | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9800 Million | 9900 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 7840HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP6 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 7840HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 7840HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 7840HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 68.27 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | AMD Radeon 610M |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 7.46 | 2.85 |
| Recency | 7 May 2020 | 17 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U has 161.8% faster integrated GPU, and 266.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 7840HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 7840HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 7840HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
