Ryzen 5 5625U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2020
8 cores / 16 threads
9.83
+1.7%
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022
6 cores / 12 threads
9.67

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5625U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking699712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesRenoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2)Barcelo-U (Zen 3)
Release date7 May 2020 (3 years old)6 January 2022 (2 years old)

Technical specs

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5625U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size156 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5625U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP6FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5625U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5625U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5625U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR4DDR4, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 7AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5625U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 9.83
+1.7%
Ryzen 5 5625U 9.67

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 15205
+1.7%
Ryzen 5 5625U 14953

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1350
Ryzen 5 5625U 1579
+17%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 17% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 5149
Ryzen 5 5625U 5466
+6.2%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 6% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 8379
+44.3%
Ryzen 5 5625U 5806

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 44% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 29574
Ryzen 5 5625U 29724
+0.5%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 1% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 11008
Ryzen 5 5625U 11440
+3.9%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 4% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 3.95
+63.5%
Ryzen 5 5625U 6.46

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 64% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 16
Ryzen 5 5625U 16
+0.7%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 1% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1410
Ryzen 5 5625U 1447
+2.6%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 3% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 181
Ryzen 5 5625U 223
+23.2%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 23% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 2.12
Ryzen 5 5625U 2.64
+24.5%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 25% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 7.1
+14.6%
Ryzen 5 5625U 6.2

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by 15% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 4227
Ryzen 5 5625U 6341
+50%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 50% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 202
Ryzen 5 5625U 229
+13.5%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 13% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 80
Ryzen 5 5625U 82
+2.8%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by 3% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.83 9.67
Recency 7 May 2020 6 January 2022
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5625U. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5625U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U
Ryzen 5 5625U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 122 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 942 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5625U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U or Ryzen 5 5625U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.