Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs Ryzen 9 5900HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.61
+3.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
13.13

Ryzen 9 5900HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking552577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency36.8044.38
Architecture codenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)20 April 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.75 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die size180 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors10,700 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP6FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 13.61
+3.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 13.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 21613
+3.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 20863

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 6380
+2.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 6238

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 41235
+11.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 36959

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 25
+7.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 23

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 2041
+2.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1992

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 237
+1.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 233

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 2.83
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 2.87
+1.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 5900HS 7867
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 8734
+11%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 5900HS 241
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 274
+13.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 5900HS 1497
+3.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1452

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 5900HS 5653
+6.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 5289

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 5900HS 57286
+9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 52568

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 5900HS 276
+2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 270

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 9 5900HS 1414
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1505
+6.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.61 13.13
Integrated graphics card 9.05 16.00
Recency 12 January 2021 20 April 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900HS has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z, on the other hand, has 76.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 177 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900HS or Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.