Ryzen 7 8700GE vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 8700GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 801 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | no data |
Power efficiency | 60.13 | no data |
Architecture codename | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
Release date | 7 May 2020 (4 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 8700GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Multiplier | 17 | no data |
L1 cache | 512 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 156 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 9800 Million | 25,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 8700GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FP6 | AM5 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 8700GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 8700GE are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 8700GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 68.27 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz) | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 8700GE.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 7.47 | 18.30 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U has 133.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 8700GE, on the other hand, has 145% faster integrated GPU, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 8700GE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700GE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 8700GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.