Ultra 7 265KF vs Itanium 9550

VS

Primary details

Comparing Itanium 9550 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated82
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data99.21
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data28.21
Architecture codenameno dataArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Itanium 9550 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.5 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Itanium 9550 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA12481851
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9550 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+

Security technologies

Itanium 9550 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9550 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Itanium 9550 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Itanium 9550 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2012 24 October 2024
Physical cores 4 20
Threads 8 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 125 Watt

Ultra 7 265KF has an age advantage of 12 years, 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 36% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Itanium 9550 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Itanium 9550 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Itanium 9550 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Itanium 9550
Itanium 9550
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate Itanium 9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Itanium 9550 or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.