Celeron 857 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 666 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.39 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2020) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 6 September 2018 (5 years ago) | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $134 |
| Current price | $999 | $458 (3.4x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | FCBGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| My WiFi | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 21.3 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors |
| Quick Sync Video | - | - |
| Clear Video HD | - | - |
| Graphics max frequency | - | 1 GHz |
| InTru 3D | - | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | - | 2 |
| eDP | - | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| SDVO | - | + |
| CRT | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X outperforms Celeron 857 by 2872% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 September 2018 | 1 July 2011 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 17 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is a desktop processor while Celeron 857 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Celeron 857, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
