A4-3300M vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X outperforms A4-3300M by a whopping 1319% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and A4-3300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 666 | 2546 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.44 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | AMD A-Series |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2020) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 19 September 2018 (5 years ago) | 14 June 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Current price | $999 | $61 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and A4-3300M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 228 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and A4-3300M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | FS1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and A4-3300M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480G |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and A4-3300M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and A4-3300M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | AMD Radeon HD 6480G |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and A4-3300M.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X outperforms A4-3300M by 1319% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X outperforms A4-3300M by 1326% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X outperforms A4-3300M by 452% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X outperforms A4-3300M by 1465% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.93 | 0.77 |
| Recency | 19 September 2018 | 14 June 2011 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 35 Watt |
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3300M in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is a desktop processor while A4-3300M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and A4-3300M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
