Turion II M500 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 outperforms Turion II M500 by a whopping 1711% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Turion II M500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 787 | 2841 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | AMD Turion II |
Power efficiency | 14.03 | 1.44 |
Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Caspian (2009) |
Release date | 6 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Turion II M500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 16 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 3600 MHz |
Multiplier | 32 | no data |
L1 cache | 768 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 4800 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Turion II M500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | Socket AM4 | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Turion II M500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | - | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Turion II M500 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Turion II M500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Turion II M500.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 9.96 | 0.55 |
Recency | 6 September 2018 | 10 September 2009 |
Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
Threads | 16 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has a 1710.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.
Turion II M500, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II M500 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is a desktop processor while Turion II M500 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and Turion II M500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.