FX-8320 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and FX-8320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	724	1459
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.81	1.44
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Ryzen 7	no data
Architecture codename	Zen+ (2018−2020)	Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date	19 September 2018 (5 years ago)	23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price	$999	$106

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 165% better value for money than FX-8320.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and FX-8320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	16	8
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.1 GHz	4 GHz
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	96K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	512K (per core)	8192 KB
L3 cache	16 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	12 nm	32 nm
Die size	192 mm2	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	61 °C
Number of transistors	4,800 million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	Yes
P0 Vcore voltage	no data	Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and FX-8320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	Socket AM4	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and FX-8320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and FX-8320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and FX-8320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Dual-channel	DDR3
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	46.933 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and FX-8320.

PCIe version	3.0	n/a
PCI Express lanes	20	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 outperforms FX-8320 by 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	9.88	3.53
Recency	19 September 2018	23 October 2012
Threads	16	8
Chip lithography	12 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and FX-8320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---