FX-4130 vs Core i3-3240

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i3-3240
2012
2 cores / 4 threads
1.49
FX-4130
2012
4 cores / 4 threads
1.72
+15.4%

FX-4130 outperforms Core i3-3240 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i3-3240 and FX-4130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20291915
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.620.26
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date3 September 2012 (11 years ago)27 August 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data
Current price$77 (1x MSRP)$39

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-3240 has 908% better value for money than FX-4130.

Technical specs

Core i3-3240 and FX-4130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3240 and FX-4130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3240 and FX-4130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-3240 and FX-4130 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3240 and FX-4130 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3240 and FX-4130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3240 and FX-4130 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3240 and FX-4130.

PCIe version2.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3240 1.49
FX-4130 1.72
+15.4%

FX-4130 outperforms Core i3-3240 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-3240 2318
FX-4130 2684
+15.8%

FX-4130 outperforms Core i3-3240 by 16% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-3240 555
+32.8%
FX-4130 418

Core i3-3240 outperforms FX-4130 by 33% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-3240 1138
+5.3%
FX-4130 1081

Core i3-3240 outperforms FX-4130 by 5% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

i3-3240 2630
FX-4130 3590
+36.5%

FX-4130 outperforms Core i3-3240 by 37% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.49 1.72
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 125 Watt

The FX-4130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3240 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3240 and FX-4130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3240
Core i3-3240
AMD FX-4130
FX-4130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1058 votes

Rate Core i3-3240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 168 votes

Rate FX-4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3240 or FX-4130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.