EPYC 7351P vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.64
EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
16.15
+67.5%

EPYC 7351P outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and EPYC 7351P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking798415
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.63
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency14.038.98
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date19 September 2018 (6 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$750

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and EPYC 7351P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3224
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and EPYC 7351P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket AM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and EPYC 7351P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and EPYC 7351P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and EPYC 7351P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and EPYC 7351P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 9.64
EPYC 7351P 16.15
+67.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 15309
EPYC 7351P 25657
+67.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 1110
+76.2%
EPYC 7351P 630

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 5355
+13%
EPYC 7351P 4738

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.64 16.15
Recency 19 September 2018 29 June 2017
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 170 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 161.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7351P, on the other hand, has a 67.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 7351P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and EPYC 7351P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 223 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 or EPYC 7351P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.