Xeon Gold 6530 vs Ryzen 7 8840U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 8840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.34
Xeon Gold 6530
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
42.50
+177%

Xeon Gold 6530 outperforms Ryzen 7 8840U by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 8840U and Xeon Gold 6530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking45958
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.12
Market segmentLaptopServer
Architecture codenameHawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,128

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 8840U and Xeon Gold 6530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)160 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size178 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors25,000 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 8840U and Xeon Gold 6530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP8FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Xeon Gold 6530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Statusno dataLaunched
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 8840U and Xeon Gold 6530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Xeon Gold 6530 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Xeon Gold 6530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780MN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Xeon Gold 6530.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 8840U 15.34
Xeon Gold 6530 42.50
+177%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 8840U 23660
Xeon Gold 6530 65533
+177%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.34 42.50
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 270 Watt

Ryzen 7 8840U has 864.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6530, on the other hand, has a 177.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 8840U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 8840U is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6530 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 8840U and Xeon Gold 6530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
Ryzen 7 8840U
Intel Xeon Gold 6530
Xeon Gold 6530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 115 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 8840U or Xeon Gold 6530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.