Ryzen 5 5500U vs Ryzen 7 7840S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.93
+88.7%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 5 5500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking397844
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Lucienne-U (Zen 2)
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 5 5500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm7 nm
Die size178 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 5 5500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 5 5500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 5 5500U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 5 5500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 5 5500U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840S 15.93
+88.7%
Ryzen 5 5500U 8.44

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 7840S 24635
+88.8%
Ryzen 5 5500U 13050

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 89% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 7840S 7579
+42.7%
Ryzen 5 5500U 5313

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 43% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 7840S 45931
+67.4%
Ryzen 5 5500U 27437

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 67% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 7840S 14547
+58.4%
Ryzen 5 5500U 9185

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 58% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 7840S 10.2
Ryzen 5 5500U 6.22
+64%

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 64% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 7840S 29
+151%
Ryzen 5 5500U 11

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 151% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 7840S 2223
+78.3%
Ryzen 5 5500U 1247

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 78% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 7840S 274
+54.8%
Ryzen 5 5500U 177

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 55% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 7840S 3.33
+67.3%
Ryzen 5 5500U 1.99

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 67% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7840S 12.9
+200%
Ryzen 5 5500U 4.3

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 200% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7840S 20369
+416%
Ryzen 5 5500U 3945

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 5 5500U by 416% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.93 8.44
Integrated graphics card 18.36 7.42
Recency 5 January 2023 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

The Ryzen 7 7840S is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 5500U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 5 5500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Ryzen 5 5500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 17732 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840S or Ryzen 5 5500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.