i5-3210M vs Ryzen 7 7840H

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.87
+1053%
Core i5-3210M
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.55

Ryzen 7 7840H outperforms Core i5-3210M by a whopping 1053% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i5-3210M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3412112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency48.324.19
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release dateJanuary 2023 (1 year ago)1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i5-3210M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm22 nm
Die size178 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors25,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i5-3210M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP8FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i5-3210M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i5-3210M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i5-3210M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i5-3210M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MIntel HD Graphics 4000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i5-3210M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i5-3210M.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840H 17.87
+1053%
i5-3210M 1.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840H 28390
+1052%
i5-3210M 2465

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.87 1.55
Integrated graphics card 18.31 1.18
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 22 nm

Ryzen 7 7840H has a 1052.9% higher aggregate performance score, 1451.7% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7840H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3210M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i5-3210M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840H
Ryzen 7 7840H
Intel Core i5-3210M
Core i5-3210M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 247 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2664 votes

Rate Core i5-3210M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840H or Core i5-3210M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.