i3-350M vs Ryzen 7 7840H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.87
+2528%
Core i3-350M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.68

Ryzen 7 7840H outperforms Core i3-350M by a whopping 2528% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i3-350M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3422718
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency48.321.84
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release dateJanuary 2023 (1 year ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$130

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i3-350M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz0.27 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die size178 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA
Number of transistors25,000 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i3-350M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP8BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i3-350M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i3-350M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i3-350M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i3-350M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i3-350M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i3-350M.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840H 17.87
+2528%
i3-350M 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840H 28390
+2514%
i3-350M 1086

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.87 0.68
Integrated graphics card 18.33 0.77
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm

Ryzen 7 7840H has a 2527.9% higher aggregate performance score, 2280.5% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7840H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-350M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840H and Core i3-350M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840H
Ryzen 7 7840H
Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 266 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 264 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840H or Core i3-350M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.