Celeron N4020C vs Ryzen 7 3750H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 3750H
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
5.24
+429%

Ryzen 7 3750H outperforms Celeron N4020C by a whopping 429% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 3750H and Celeron N4020C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11672428
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Architecture codenamePicasso (Zen+) (2019)no data
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 3750H and Celeron N4020C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHzno data
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography12 nmno data
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 3750H and Celeron N4020C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Celeron N4020C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Celeron N4020C are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Celeron N4020C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 10no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Celeron N4020C.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes126

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 3750H 5.24
+429%
Celeron N4020C 0.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 3750H 8101
+429%
Celeron N4020C 1532

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.24 0.99
Recency 6 January 2019 1 January 2021
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 7 3750H has a 429.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron N4020C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 3750H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4020C in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 3750H and Celeron N4020C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Ryzen 7 3750H
Intel Celeron N4020C
Celeron N4020C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1316 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3750H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 91 vote

Rate Celeron N4020C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 3750H or Celeron N4020C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.