Celeron G4900T vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Celeron G4900T by a whopping 909% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 506 | 2198 |
| Place by popularity | 73 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 19.11 | 5.80 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 20.66 | 3.80 |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 (5 years ago) | 3 April 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $42 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 7 3700X has 229% better value for money than Celeron G4900T.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 29 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 126 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 88 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | - | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
| Max video memory | - | 64 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | - | 1 GHz |
| InTru 3D | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | - | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | - | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | - | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | - | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | - | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | - | 12 |
| OpenGL | - | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.73 | 1.46 |
| Recency | 27 May 2019 | 3 April 2018 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 7 3700X has a 908.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron G4900T, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 7 3700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G4900T in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 3700X and Celeron G4900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
