Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Ryzen 7 3700U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.63
Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.78
+198%

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 3700U and Ryzen 9 5980HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1226501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+)Cezanne-HS (Zen 3)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$625 no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 3700U and Ryzen 9 5980HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 3700U and Ryzen 9 5980HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Ryzen 9 5980HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Ryzen 9 5980HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Ryzen 9 5980HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Ryzen 9 5980HS.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 3700U 4.63
Ryzen 9 5980HS 13.78
+198%

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 3700U 7162
Ryzen 9 5980HS 21318
+198%

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 198% in Passmark.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 3700U 13.48
Ryzen 9 5980HS 3.47
+288%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Ryzen 9 5980HS by 288% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 3700U 672
Ryzen 9 5980HS 2083
+210%

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 210% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 3700U 139
Ryzen 9 5980HS 243
+74.8%

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 75% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3700U 27
Ryzen 9 5980HS 112
+311%

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 311% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 3700U 105
Ryzen 9 5980HS 270
+157%

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 157% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.63 13.78
Integrated graphics card 4.24 9.08
Recency 6 January 2019 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 9 5980HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 3700U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 3700U and Ryzen 9 5980HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
Ryzen 9 5980HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1379 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 28 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5980HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 3700U or Ryzen 9 5980HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.