Ryzen 7 7735U vs Ryzen 9 5980HS

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads
13.79
Ryzen 7 7735U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads
13.82
+0.2%

Primary Details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 7735U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking483481
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)no data
Architecture codenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3)Rembrandt-U Refresh
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed Specifications

Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 7735U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die size156 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 7735U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 7735U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 7735U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 7735U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR4DDR5, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 7735U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5980HS 13.79
Ryzen 7 7735U 13.82
+0.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 5980HS 21320
Ryzen 7 7735U 21378
+0.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 9 5980HS 3.47
+49.3%
Ryzen 7 7735U 5.18

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Ryzen 9 5980HS by 49% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 5980HS 2083
+22.7%
Ryzen 7 7735U 1698

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 23% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 5980HS 243
+3.8%
Ryzen 7 7735U 234

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 4% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 5980HS 270
+17.9%
Ryzen 7 7735U 229

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 18% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 5980HS 112
+23.1%
Ryzen 7 7735U 91

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 23% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 13.79 13.82
Integrated graphics card 9.06 16.93
Recency 12 January 2021 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 7735U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 7735U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
Ryzen 9 5980HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
Ryzen 7 7735U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 28 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5980HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 66 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5980HS or Ryzen 7 7735U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.