EPYC 7H12 vs Ryzen 7 2700

Primary Details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	687	38
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	21.46	22.44
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	AMD Ryzen 7	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Zen+ (2018−2020)	Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date	13 April 2018 (6 years ago)	18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$299	no data
Current price	$176 (0.6x MSRP)	$1970

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7H12 has 5% better value for money than Ryzen 7 2700.

Detailed Specifications

Ryzen 7 2700 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads	16	128
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.1 GHz	3.3 GHz
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	768 KB	4 MB
L2 cache	4 MB	32 MB
L3 cache	16 MB (shared)	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Die size	213 mm2	192 mm2
Number of transistors	4800 Million	4,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	AM4	TR4
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Dual-channel	DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size	64 GB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	2	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	46.933 GB/s	204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	20	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 343% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Performance score	10.01	44.32
Recency	13 April 2018	18 September 2019
Physical cores	8	64
Threads	16	128
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	280 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---