A10-9620P vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
10.82
+556%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by a whopping 556% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A10-9620P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6721987
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataBristol Ridge
Architecture codenameRembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date19 April 2022 (2 years ago)1 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Current priceno data$886

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography6 nm28 nm
Die size208 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP7FP4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A10-9620P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A10-9620P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 660MAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A10-9620P.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 10.82
+556%
A10-9620P 1.65

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 556% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 16728
+554%
A10-9620P 2559

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 554% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 1692
+239%
A10-9620P 499

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 239% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 6470
+489%
A10-9620P 1099

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 489% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 6062
+166%
A10-9620P 2277

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 166% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 32262
+335%
A10-9620P 7420

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 335% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 7.74
+86.2%
A10-9620P 14.41

A10-9620P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U by 86% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 16
+509%
A10-9620P 3

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 509% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 1460
+535%
A10-9620P 230

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 535% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 233
+223%
A10-9620P 72

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 223% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 2.79
+244%
A10-9620P 0.81

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 244% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 5343
+302%
A10-9620P 1329

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 302% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 86
+430%
A10-9620P 16

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 430% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 224
+193%
A10-9620P 77

Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U outperforms A10-9620P by 193% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.82 1.65
Integrated graphics card 9.78 2.45
Recency 19 April 2022 1 January 2017
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm

The Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and A10-9620P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 34 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 286 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U or A10-9620P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.