A10-9620P vs FX-9800P

Place in performance ranking	1948	1945
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	Bristol Ridge
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	1 June 2016 (7 years old)	1 January 2017 (7 years old)
Current price	$926	$886

Technical specs

FX-9800P and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	2.7 GHz	2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.6 GHz	3.4 GHz
L2 cache	2 MB	2 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Die size	250 mm²	250 mm²
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	90 °C
Number of transistors	3100 Million	3100 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	no data	FP4
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and A10-9620P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions

Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9800P 1.67

A10-9620P 1.68
+0.6%

A10-9620P outperforms FX-9800P by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-9800P 2554

A10-9620P 2568
+0.5%

A10-9620P outperforms FX-9800P by 1% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-9800P 499

A10-9620P 502
+0.6%

A10-9620P outperforms FX-9800P by 1% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-9800P 1101

A10-9620P 1104
+0.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

FX-9800P 14.4
+0.1%

A10-9620P 14.41

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FX-9800P 3
+7.5%

A10-9620P 3

FX-9800P outperforms A10-9620P by 8% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-9800P 236
+2.6%

A10-9620P 230

FX-9800P outperforms A10-9620P by 3% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-9800P 74
+2.8%

A10-9620P 72

FX-9800P outperforms A10-9620P by 3% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

FX-9800P 0.91
+12.3%

A10-9620P 0.81

FX-9800P outperforms A10-9620P by 12% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.