Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.48
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 54 Watt
14.77
+40.9%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking739488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameRenoir (2020−2023)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date21 July 2020 (4 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size156 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 7AMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 10.48
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 14.77
+40.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 16164
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22778
+40.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 1569
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2183
+39.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 6166
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 8970
+45.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.48 14.77
Recency 21 July 2020 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 54 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS has a 40.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 20.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1567 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G or Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.