Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Ryzen 3 4300G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 3 4300G by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1255 | 610 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 3.66 | 10.19 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Renoir (2020−2023) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 21 July 2020 (5 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 4300G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 38 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 4300G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 4300G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 4300G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 4300G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 6 | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 4300G and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.63 | 13.02 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.80 | 13.17 |
| Recency | 21 July 2020 | 5 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 54 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS has a 131.3% higher aggregate performance score, 370.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 20.4% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 4300G in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 3 4300G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
