E-350 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking889not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD E-Series
Power efficiency12.35no data
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date6 September 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache576 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm40 nm
Die size213 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FT1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon HD 6310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and E-350.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 13465
+3098%
E-350 421

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 1175
+1019%
E-350 105

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 4742
+2549%
E-350 179

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 September 2018 4 January 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 has an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

E-350, on the other hand, has 261.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and E-350. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is a desktop processor while E-350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 176 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.