Ryzen 3 3300X vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 outperforms Ryzen 3 3300X by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Ryzen 3 3300X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 786 | 794 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 16.90 | 27.02 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2020) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 6 September 2018 (5 years old) | 24 April 2020 (3 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $120 |
| Current price | $215 | $195 (1.6x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 3 3300X has 60% better value for money than Ryzen 5 PRO 2600.
Technical specs
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Ryzen 3 3300X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 576 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Ryzen 3 3300X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Ryzen 3 3300X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Ryzen 3 3300X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Ryzen 3 3300X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Ryzen 3 3300X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 outperforms Ryzen 3 3300X by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 outperforms Ryzen 3 3300X by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 by 43% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 by 24% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 8.74 | 8.68 |
| Recency | 6 September 2018 | 24 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Ryzen 3 3300X. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Ryzen 3 3300X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
