Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs Ryzen 5 5500GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 5500GT
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.72
+2858%
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43

Ryzen 5 5500GT outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3000 by a whopping 2858% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 5500GT and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6092966
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.44no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency18.531.16
Architecture codenameCezanne (2021−2024)Penryn-1M (2009)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)1 May 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$125no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 5500GT and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache16 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm45 nm
Die size180 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 5500GT and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4P (478)
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Celeron Dual-Core T3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Celeron Dual-Core T3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 7no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Celeron Dual-Core T3000.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 5500GT 12.72
+2858%
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 5500GT 20198
+2840%
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 687

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.72 0.43
Recency 8 January 2024 1 May 2009
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 5500GT has a 2858.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 5500GT is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 5500GT is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 5500GT and Celeron Dual-Core T3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT
Ryzen 5 5500GT
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 201 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 5500GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 5500GT or Celeron Dual-Core T3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.