EPYC 9654P vs Ryzen 5 2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.62
EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
74.46
+764%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by a whopping 764% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9016
Place by popularity22not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.001.88
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency12.0918.86
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date13 April 2018 (6 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$10,625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 432% better value for money than EPYC 9654P.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)96
Threads12192
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3424
L1 cache576 KB6 MB
L2 cache3 MB96 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size213 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4800 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9654P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600 8.62
EPYC 9654P 74.46
+764%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600 13189
EPYC 9654P 113949
+764%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.62 74.46
Recency 13 April 2018 10 November 2022
Physical cores 6 96
Threads 12 192
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600 has 453.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654P, on the other hand, has a 763.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14863 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or EPYC 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.