EPYC 9634 vs Ryzen 5 2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.53
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
69.79
+718%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by a whopping 718% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8368
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.0810.03
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+)Genoa
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$10,304
Current price$142 (0.7x MSRP)$3950 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 90% better value for money than EPYC 9634.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)84
Threads12168
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,800 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9634.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600 8.53
EPYC 9634 69.79
+718%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by 718% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 2600 13197
EPYC 9634 107944
+718%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by 718% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.53 69.79
Recency 19 April 2018 10 November 2022
Physical cores 6 84
Threads 12 168
Cost $199 $10304
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 290 Watt

The EPYC 9634 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9634 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and EPYC 9634, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14298 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.