FX-9370 vs Ryzen 5 1600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.22
+109%
FX-9370
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
3.94

Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms FX-9370 by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-9370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9161433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.40no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency8.191.69
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)6 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-9370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data57 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-9370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-9370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-9370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-9370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-9370.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.22
+109%
FX-9370 3.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13057
+109%
FX-9370 6255

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 1600X 1136
+123%
FX-9370 510

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 1600X 4758
+136%
FX-9370 2019

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.22 3.94
Recency 11 April 2017 6 July 2013
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 220 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600X has a 108.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 50% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 131.6% lower power consumption.

FX-9370, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores.

The Ryzen 5 1600X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and FX-9370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD FX-9370
FX-9370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 902 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 159 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or FX-9370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.