Athlon X4 950 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.37
+89.2%
Athlon X4 950
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.31

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G outperforms Athlon X4 950 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon X4 950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13611812
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.66
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency6.243.30
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon X4 950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache384 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size209.78 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon X4 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon X4 950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon X4 950 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon X4 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon X4 950.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 4.37
+89.2%
Athlon X4 950 2.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 6812
+89.4%
Athlon X4 950 3596

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.37 2.31
Recency 10 May 2018 27 July 2017
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a 89.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon X4 950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
AMD Athlon X4 950
Athlon X4 950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 85 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 284 votes

Rate Athlon X4 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G or Athlon X4 950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.