A9-9425 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [_id] => 509
            [filename] => Core-i5-7600K
            [title] => Intel Core i5-7600K
            [manufacturer] => Intel
            [result] => 4.40
            [_number] => 1323
            [cores] => 4 / 4
            [custom_id] => 
        )

)

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1321	1976
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	AMD Ryzen 3	AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codename	Zen (2017−2020)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	10 May 2018 (6 years ago)	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	no data	3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	3.7 GHz
Multiplier	35	no data
L1 cache	384 KB	128K (per core)
L2 cache	2 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	no data
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Die size	209.78 mm²	124.5 mm²
Maximum core temperature	no data	90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	74 °C
Number of transistors	4950 Million	1200 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	Socket AM4	FT4
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	+	+
Precision Boost 2	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2933	DDR4
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	46.933 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and A9-9425.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	12	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 4.40
+149%

A9-9425 1.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 6812
+351%

A9-9425 1510

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.40	1.77
Integrated graphics card	4.50	1.33
Recency	10 May 2018	1 June 2016
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	15 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a 148.6% higher aggregate performance score, 238.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A9-9425, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9425 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a desktop processor while A9-9425 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.