Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Processor N50
Primary details
Comparing Processor N50 and Ryzen 7 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 305 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Processor N50 and Ryzen 7 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N50 and Ryzen 7 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N50 and Ryzen 7 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Processor N50 and Ryzen 7 7840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N50 and Ryzen 7 7840HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N50 and Ryzen 7 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N50 and Ryzen 7 7840HS.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.30 | 18.31 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Processor N50 has 483.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 7840HS, on the other hand, has 696.1% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Processor N50 and Ryzen 7 7840HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N50 and Ryzen 7 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
