Opteron X3216 vs Processor N100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
3.29
+243%

Processor N100 outperforms Opteron X3216 by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N100 and Opteron X3216 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15742476
Place by popularity88not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Excavator (2017−2018)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$128no data

Detailed specifications

Processor N100 and Opteron X3216 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed0.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Processor N100 and Opteron X3216 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264FP4
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N100 and Opteron X3216. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Processor N100 and Opteron X3216 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N100 and Opteron X3216 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N100 and Opteron X3216. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)Radeon Rx Series 4CU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N100 and Opteron X3216.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes98

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.29 0.96
Recency 3 January 2023 10 June 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

Processor N100 has a 242.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron X3216 in performance tests.

Be aware that Processor N100 is a notebook processor while Opteron X3216 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N100 and Opteron X3216, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N100
Processor N100
AMD Opteron X3216
Opteron X3216

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1056 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X3216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N100 or Opteron X3216, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.