EPYC 4244P vs Processor N100
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4244P outperforms Processor N100 by a whopping 439% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Processor N100 and EPYC 4244P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1514 | 323 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Alder Lake-N | no data |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N | Raphael |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $128 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Processor N100 and EPYC 4244P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N100 and EPYC 4244P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4244P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Processor N100 and EPYC 4244P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4244P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4244P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4244P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.29 | 17.72 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 65 Watt |
The EPYC 4244P is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Processor N100 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4244P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N100 and EPYC 4244P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
