EPYC 4484PX vs Processor N100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.43
EPYC 4484PX
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
32.18
+1224%

EPYC 4484PX outperforms Processor N100 by a whopping 1224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N100 and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1776126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Power efficiency38.3525.39
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$128$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Processor N100 and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed0.1 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Processor N100 and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264AM5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Processor N100 and EPYC 4484PX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4484PX.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes928

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 32.18
Integrated graphics card 2.32 1.98
Recency 3 January 2023 21 May 2024
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 120 Watt

Processor N100 has 17.2% faster integrated GPU, and 1900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has a 1224.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4484PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Processor N100 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N100 and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N100
Processor N100
AMD EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 4484PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1324 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4484PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N100 or EPYC 4484PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.