E2-7110 vs Pro A10-8700B

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pro A10-8700B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
1.43

E2-7110 outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20852054
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release date3 June 2015 (8 years ago)7 May 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price$326 $385

Detailed specifications

Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.8 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt12-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVXAVX+
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune--
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect++
RAID+no data
HSA+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110 are enumerated here.

AMD-V11
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133DDR3L-1600
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro A10-8700B 1.43
E2-7110 1.48
+3.5%

E2-7110 outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pro A10-8700B 2217
E2-7110 2282
+2.9%

E2-7110 outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 3% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pro A10-8700B 474
+158%
E2-7110 184

Pro A10-8700B outperforms E2-7110 by 158% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pro A10-8700B 999
+86.4%
E2-7110 536

Pro A10-8700B outperforms E2-7110 by 86% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pro A10-8700B 2200
+54%
E2-7110 1429

Pro A10-8700B outperforms E2-7110 by 54% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pro A10-8700B 5907
+18.8%
E2-7110 4974

Pro A10-8700B outperforms E2-7110 by 19% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pro A10-8700B 2798
+16.2%
E2-7110 2407

Pro A10-8700B outperforms E2-7110 by 16% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pro A10-8700B 30.7
E2-7110 29.19
+5.2%

Pro A10-8700B outperforms E2-7110 by 5% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro A10-8700B 2
+28.7%
E2-7110 2

Pro A10-8700B outperforms E2-7110 by 29% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pro A10-8700B 192
+37.1%
E2-7110 140

Pro A10-8700B outperforms E2-7110 by 37% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pro A10-8700B 70
+89.2%
E2-7110 37

Pro A10-8700B outperforms E2-7110 by 89% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro A10-8700B 0.82
+82.2%
E2-7110 0.45

Pro A10-8700B outperforms E2-7110 by 82% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pro A10-8700B 0.9
E2-7110 1.1
+29.4%

E2-7110 outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 29% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pro A10-8700B 897
E2-7110 1090
+21.5%

E2-7110 outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 22% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pro A10-8700B 45
E2-7110 46
+2.3%

E2-7110 outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 2% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pro A10-8700B 9
E2-7110 11
+19.1%

E2-7110 outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 19% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pro A10-8700B 950
E2-7110 1012
+6.5%

E2-7110 outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 7% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pro A10-8700B 2728
E2-7110 3253
+19.2%

E2-7110 outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 19% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.43 1.48

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A10-8700B and E2-7110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A10-8700B
Pro A10-8700B
AMD E2-7110
E2-7110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 48 votes

Rate Pro A10-8700B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 207 votes

Rate E2-7110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A10-8700B or E2-7110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.