Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Phenom X4 9500

Place in performance ranking	2345	2665
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.34	1.10
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Agena (2007−2008)	Windsor (2006−2009)
Release date	November 2007 (16 years ago)	August 2007 (16 years ago)
Current price	$22	$53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom X4 9500 has 385% better value for money than Athlon 64 X2 6000+.

Detailed specifications

Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	3.1 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	256 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	512K
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	65 nm	90 nm
Die size	285 mm²	220 mm²
Number of transistors	450 million	227 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM2+	AM2
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	125 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom X4 9500 1.00
+66.7%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 0.60

Phenom X4 9500 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by 67% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Phenom X4 9500 1549
+65.8%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 934

Phenom X4 9500 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by 66% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Phenom X4 9500 200

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 279
+39.5%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Phenom X4 9500 by 40% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Phenom X4 9500 687
+36%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 505

Phenom X4 9500 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by 36% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.