Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Phenom II X4 N930

VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 N930 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2465not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom II2x AMD Turion 64
Power efficiency2.66no data
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Tyler (2007−2009)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)4 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 N930 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 N930 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N930 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3dNow!, SSE (2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Vurtualization, HyperTransport 3.0no data
VirusProtect+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N930 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Phenom II X4 N930 2831
+111%
Turion 64 X2 TL-58 1339

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 May 2010 4 May 2007
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 31 Watt

Phenom II X4 N930 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58, on the other hand, has 12.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 N930 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 N930 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 N930
Phenom II X4 N930
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 100 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 27 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-58 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 N930 or Turion 64 X2 TL-58, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.