E1-6010 vs Phenom II X3 P820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2630not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series3x AMD Phenom IIAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Beema (2014)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Current priceno data$314

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads32
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.35 GHz
Bus support3600 MHzno data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache1.5 MB1024 KB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsintegrated DDR3 Memory Controller, Virtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a)86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1333
AES-NIno data+
FMAno dataFMA4
AVXno data+
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+1
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Phenom II X3 P820 1560
+55.1%
E1-6010 1006

Phenom II X3 P820 outperforms E1-6010 by 55% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Phenom II X3 P820 4169
+134%
E1-6010 1784

Phenom II X3 P820 outperforms E1-6010 by 134% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Phenom II X3 P820 2043
+120%
E1-6010 927

Phenom II X3 P820 outperforms E1-6010 by 120% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Phenom II X3 P820 2
+161%
E1-6010 1

Phenom II X3 P820 outperforms E1-6010 by 161% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 May 2010 29 April 2014
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 P820 and E1-6010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X3 P820
Phenom II X3 P820
AMD E1-6010
E1-6010

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 48 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 P820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 529 votes

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X3 P820 or E1-6010, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.