Ryzen 7 5700U vs Pentium M 765

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 765
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.22
Ryzen 7 5700U
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
9.92
+4409%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms Pentium M 765 by a whopping 4409% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 7 5700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3197779
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency0.9962.63
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021)
Release date20 October 2004 (20 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 7 5700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data18
L1 cache32 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm
Die size87 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors144 million9,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.988-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 7 5700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FP6
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 7 5700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 7 5700U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 7 5700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 7 5700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 7 5700U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 765 0.22
Ryzen 7 5700U 9.92
+4409%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium M 765 1834
Ryzen 7 5700U 5780
+215%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium M 765 864
Ryzen 7 5700U 11662
+1250%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 9.92
Recency 20 October 2004 12 January 2021
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium M 765 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 5700U, on the other hand, has a 4409.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 5700U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 765 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 7 5700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
Ryzen 7 5700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3265 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 765 or Ryzen 7 5700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.