FX-6330 vs E2-3200

Primary details

Comparing E2-3200 and FX-6330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2677	1591
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.30	0.89
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Llano (2011−2012)	Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date	7 September 2011 (12 years ago)	15 December 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price	$22	$76

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

E2-3200 has 46% better value for money than FX-6330.

Detailed specifications

E2-3200 and FX-6330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	2	6
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	4.2 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	288 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	6 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	32 nm
Die size	228 mm2	315 mm2
Number of transistors	1,178 million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on E2-3200 and FX-6330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FM1	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3200 and FX-6330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	no data	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and FX-6330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and FX-6330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Radeon HD 6370D

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3200 and FX-6330.

PCIe version

no data

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6330 outperforms E2-3200 by 356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.63	2.87
Recency	7 September 2011	15 December 2015
Physical cores	2	6
Threads	2	6
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3200 and FX-6330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---