A10-4657M vs Celeron M 353

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2686
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD A-Series
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release dateno data1 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 353 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1303 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 353 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA
Power consumption (TDP)512 KB4 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 512 Watt 4 Watt

A10-4657M has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 12700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 353 and AMD A10-4657M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353
AMD A10-4657M
A10-4657M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 32 votes

Rate Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate A10-4657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M 353 and A10-4657M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.