Celeron 1037U vs Pentium G620T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G620T
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.58
Celeron 1037U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.65
+12.1%

Celeron 1037U outperforms Pentium G620T by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G620T and Celeron 1037U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking27092662
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.00no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date22 May 2011 (13 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$86
Current price$86 (1.1x MSRP)$246 (2.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G620T and Celeron 1037U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size131 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors504 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G620T and Celeron 1037U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G620T and Celeron 1037U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Pentium G620T and Celeron 1037U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G620T and Celeron 1037U are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G620T and Celeron 1037U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video--
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G620T and Celeron 1037U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G620T and Celeron 1037U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G620T 0.58
Celeron 1037U 0.65
+12.1%

Celeron 1037U outperforms Pentium G620T by 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium G620T 896
Celeron 1037U 998
+11.4%

Celeron 1037U outperforms Pentium G620T by 11% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium G620T 393
+26.4%
Celeron 1037U 311

Pentium G620T outperforms Celeron 1037U by 26% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium G620T 762
+46%
Celeron 1037U 522

Pentium G620T outperforms Celeron 1037U by 46% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 0.65
Recency 22 May 2011 20 January 2013
Cost $80 $86
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

The Celeron 1037U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G620T in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G620T is a desktop processor while Celeron 1037U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G620T and Celeron 1037U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G620T
Pentium G620T
Intel Celeron 1037U
Celeron 1037U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate Pentium G620T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 74 votes

Rate Celeron 1037U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G620T or Celeron 1037U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.