Celeron G440 vs Pentium E6500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E6500
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.73
+181%
Celeron G440
2011
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.26

Pentium E6500 outperforms Celeron G440 by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E6500 and Celeron G440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26873148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.74no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.060.70
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date9 August 2009 (15 years ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$50$45

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium E6500 and Celeron G440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.93 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)256 KB
L3 cache0 KB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size82 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C66 °C
Number of transistors228 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V – 1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E6500 and Celeron G440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E6500 and Celeron G440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Pentium E6500 and Celeron G440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E6500 and Celeron G440 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E6500 and Celeron G440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium E6500 and Celeron G440 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E6500 and Celeron G440.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E6500 0.73
+181%
Celeron G440 0.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E6500 1161
+176%
Celeron G440 420

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 0.26
Recency 9 August 2009 4 September 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Pentium E6500 has a 180.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G440, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Pentium E6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G440 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E6500 and Celeron G440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E6500
Pentium E6500
Intel Celeron G440
Celeron G440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 264 votes

Rate Pentium E6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 53 votes

Rate Celeron G440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E6500 or Celeron G440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.