Celeron G440 vs Athlon 64 FX-55

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date10 October 2004 (20 years ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180$45

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB1 MB
Chip lithography130 nm32 nm
Die size193 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)104 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1 Depends on motherboardDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-55 404
Celeron G440 420
+4%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2004 4 September 2011
Chip lithography 130 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 104 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron G440 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 197.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-55 and Celeron G440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Athlon 64 FX-55
Intel Celeron G440
Celeron G440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 52 votes

Rate Celeron G440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-55 or Celeron G440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.