Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium E5200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E5200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.59
+25.5%
Celeron 1047UE
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.47

Pentium E5200 outperforms Celeron 1047UE by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E5200 and Celeron 1047UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28002910
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.862.62
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99$134

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium E5200 and Celeron 1047UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size82 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors228 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E5200 and Celeron 1047UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775Intel BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5200 and Celeron 1047UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium E5200 and Celeron 1047UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5200 and Celeron 1047UE are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5200 and Celeron 1047UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E5200 0.59
+25.5%
Celeron 1047UE 0.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E5200 936
+25.1%
Celeron 1047UE 748

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 0.47
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

Pentium E5200 has a 25.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 1047UE, on the other hand, has a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.

The Pentium E5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1047UE in performance tests.

Note that Pentium E5200 is a desktop processor while Celeron 1047UE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5200 and Celeron 1047UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E5200
Pentium E5200
Intel Celeron 1047UE
Celeron 1047UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 293 votes

Rate Pentium E5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 1047UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E5200 or Celeron 1047UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.