E-450 vs Pentium Dual SU4100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core SU4100
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.31
E-450
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.48
+54.8%

E-450 outperforms Pentium Dual Core SU4100 by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and E-450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30912896
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreAMD E-Series
Power efficiency2.932.52
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)22 August 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and E-450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.65 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size107 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and E-450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and E-450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and E-450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and E-450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6320

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Dual SU4100 0.31
E-450 0.48
+54.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual SU4100 492
E-450 765
+55.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium Dual SU4100 1409
+32.6%
E-450 1063

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium Dual SU4100 2671
+32.2%
E-450 2021

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium Dual SU4100 1169
+13%
E-450 1035

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium Dual SU4100 90.15
E-450 64.5
+39.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.48
Recency 1 September 2009 22 August 2011
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 18 Watt

Pentium Dual SU4100 has 80% lower power consumption.

E-450, on the other hand, has a 54.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

The E-450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and E-450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
AMD E-450
E-450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 5 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core SU4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 538 votes

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core SU4100 or E-450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.