FX-4150 vs Pentium B940

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium B940
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.54
FX-4150
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.09
+287%

FX-4150 outperforms Pentium B940 by a whopping 287% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium B940 and FX-4150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28351873
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency1.462.08
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium B940 and FX-4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium B940 and FX-4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPGA988AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium B940 and FX-4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium B940 and FX-4150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium B940 and FX-4150 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium B940 and FX-4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium B940 and FX-4150 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium B940 and FX-4150.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium B940 0.54
FX-4150 2.09
+287%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium B940 861
FX-4150 3327
+286%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 2.09
Recency 19 June 2011 23 October 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Pentium B940 has 171.4% lower power consumption.

FX-4150, on the other hand, has a 287% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The FX-4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium B940 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium B940 is a notebook processor while FX-4150 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium B940 and FX-4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium B940
Pentium B940
AMD FX-4150
FX-4150

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 141 vote

Rate Pentium B940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate FX-4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium B940 or FX-4150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.