Celeron B820 vs Pentium A1018

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium A1018
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.76
+52%
Celeron B820
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.50

Pentium A1018 outperforms Celeron B820 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium A1018 and Celeron B820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26432875
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.051.35
Architecture codenameno dataSandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)1 July 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Pentium A1018 and Celeron B820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data17
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data256K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB Intel® Smart Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium A1018 and Celeron B820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium A1018 and Celeron B820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Pentium A1018 and Celeron B820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium A1018 and Celeron B820 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium A1018 and Celeron B820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium A1018 and Celeron B820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO++
CRT++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium A1018 and Celeron B820.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium A1018 0.76
+52%
Celeron B820 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium A1018 1210
+50.9%
Celeron B820 802

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 0.50
Recency 1 July 2013 1 July 2012
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm

Pentium A1018 has a 52% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Pentium A1018 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B820 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium A1018 and Celeron B820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium A1018
Pentium A1018
Intel Celeron B820
Celeron B820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 16 votes

Rate Pentium A1018 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 141 vote

Rate Celeron B820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium A1018 or Celeron B820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.